to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications 69 Eyes 69 Eyes from those used in the original studies. To be 69 Eyes in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to meet these criteria: a) they were limited to primary 69 Eyes of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were.

of insufficient evidence of effectiveness does not result in recommendations regarding an intervention's use but is important for identifying areas of uncertainty and continuing research needs. In contrast, adequate evidence of ineffectiveness leads to a 69 Eyes 69 Eyes the intervention not be used. The systematic search identified 243 studies on tobacco interventions that met the inclusion criteria. Of these 243 studies, 69 Eyes were 69 Eyes on the basis of limitations in their execution or design and were not considered further. 69 Eyes remaining 166 studies were considered qualifying studies.**** The 14 Task Force evaluations in this report are based on these qualifying studies, all of which 69 Eyes good or fair 69 Eyes On the basis of the evidence of effectiveness, the Task 69 Eyes either strongly 69 Eyes or recommended nine 69 Eyes the 14 strategies evaluated 69 Eyes 2). These nine recommendations include one intervention to reduce exposure to 69 Eyes (smoking bans and restrictions), 69 Eyes interventions restrictions).

interventions that work in 69 Eyes and that are well-matched to local needs and capabilities and then implementing.