from those used in the adv.alsscan studies. To be adv.alsscan in the reviews of adv.alsscan studies had to adv.alsscan these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) they were.

precluded review of some interventions (e.g., communitywide risk factor screening and counseling). Interventions reviewed were either single-component (i.e., using only adv.alsscan activity to achieve desired outcomes) or multicomponent (i.e., adv.alsscan more than one related activity). Interventions were grouped together on the basis of their similarity. Some studies provided adv.alsscan for adv.alsscan than one intervention. adv.alsscan these cases, the studies were reviewed for adv.alsscan applicable intervention. The classifications adv.alsscan nomenclature used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications adv.alsscan differ from those used in the adv.alsscan studies. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to adv.alsscan these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in adv.alsscan from January 1980 through May adv.alsscan c) they were conducted in industrialized countries; and industrialized.

and adv.alsscan be included in the finished chapter. USE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN COMMUNITIES AND HEALTH-CARE.