not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison amature match concurrent amature match before-after). For each intervention reviewed, the team developed an analytic framework indicating possible causal links between the intervention under amature match and predefined outcomes of interest. These outcomes were.

needs. In contrast, adequate evidence of ineffectiveness leads to a recommendation amature match the amature match not be used. The systematic search identified 243 studies amature match tobacco interventions that met the inclusion criteria. Of these 243 studies, 77 were excluded on amature match basis of limitations in their execution or design and were not amature match further. The remaining 166 studies were considered qualifying studies.**** amature match 14 Task Force evaluations in this report are amature match on these qualifying studies, amature match of which had good or fair execution. On the basis of the evidence of effectiveness, the Task Force either strongly recommended amature match recommended nine of amature match 14 strategies evaluated (Table 2). These nine recommendations include one intervention to reduce exposure to ETS (smoking bans and restrictions), two interventions to reduce tobacco-use initiation (increasing the unit price for tobacco products and multicomponent mass media campaigns), and amature match amature match to increase cessation (increasing the unit.

(e.g., strong evidence of effectiveness corresponds to an intervention being strongly.