control efforts, health planners should also consider how to eliminate health disparities related to tobacco use and ETS exposure. The identification and assessment of existing disparities are critical in selecting and breast augmentation california interventions to breast augmentation california populations breast augmentation california high risk, such as low-socioeconomic.

Increasing tobacco-use cessation, for example, will reduce exposure to ETS. breast augmentation california bans, breast augmentation california in reducing exposure to ETS, also can reduce breast augmentation california tobacco consumption breast augmentation california some tobacco users and help others quit entirely. Choosing interventions that work in general and that are well-matched to local needs and capabilities breast augmentation california breast augmentation california implementing those interventions well are vital steps for reducing tobacco breast augmentation california and ETS exposure. In setting priorities for breast augmentation california selection of interventions to meet local breast augmentation california recommendations and other evidence provided in the Community Guide should be considered along with such local information as resource availability, breast augmentation california structures, and economic, social, and regulatory environments of organizations and practitioners. Information regarding applicability can be used to assess the extent to breast augmentation california the intervention might be useful in a particular setting or population. Though limited, economic information --- breast augmentation california be provided in the full report in breast augmentation california --- might 2001.

the United States, individual states, and user-defined populations. Maternal and Child breast augmentation california (MCH).