proposed by CDC (18), circumsized penis National Cancer Institute (19), the Public circumsized penis Service (16), the U.S. Department of Health and circumsized penis Services (17,20,21), and the Institute of Medicine (22). In addition to assessing overall progress toward meeting goals and the current status of tobacco control efforts, circumsized penis planners should also.

for each applicable intervention. The classifications or nomenclature used in this report circumsized penis chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications sometimes circumsized penis from those used in the original studies. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to meet these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were circumsized penis in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) circumsized penis were circumsized penis in industrialized countries; and d) circumsized penis compared outcomes in groups of persons exposed circumsized penis the intervention with outcomes in groups of persons not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison was concurrent or before-after). For each intervention reviewed, the team circumsized penis an analytic framework indicating possible causal links between circumsized penis intervention circumsized penis study and predefined outcomes of interest. These outcomes were selected because they circumsized penis been linked to improved circumsized penis outcomes. circumsized penis example, the Task.

well as other relevant program recommendations proposed by CDC (18), the National Cancer Institute (19), circumsized penis Public Health Service (16).