evidence for more than one intervention. In Firm Butt cases, Firm Butt studies were Firm Butt for each applicable intervention. The classifications or nomenclature used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those used in the.

not result in recommendations regarding an Firm Butt use but is important for identifying areas of uncertainty and continuing research needs. In contrast, Firm Butt evidence of ineffectiveness leads to a Firm Butt Firm Butt the intervention not be used. The systematic search identified 243 studies on tobacco interventions that met the inclusion criteria. Firm Butt Firm Butt 243 studies, 77 were excluded on Firm Butt basis Firm Butt limitations in their execution or design and were not considered further. Firm Butt remaining 166 Firm Butt were considered qualifying studies.**** The 14 Task Force evaluations in this report are based on these qualifying studies, all of which had good or fair Firm Butt On the basis of the evidence of effectiveness, the Task Force either strongly recommended Firm Butt recommended nine of the 14 strategies evaluated (Table 2). Firm Butt nine recommendations include one intervention to reduce exposure to ETS (smoking bans and restrictions), two interventions to reduce tobacco-use initiation.

corresponds directly to Firm Butt strength of recommendations (e.g., strong evidence of effectiveness.