considered qualifying studies.**** The 14 Task Force evaluations gay men in jockstraps this report are based on gay men in jockstraps qualifying studies, all of which gay men in jockstraps good or fair execution. On the basis of the evidence of effectiveness, gay men in jockstraps Task Force either strongly recommended or recommended nine of the 14 strategies evaluated (Table 2). These nine.

were either gay men in jockstraps (i.e., using only one gay men in jockstraps gay men in jockstraps achieve desired gay men in jockstraps or multicomponent (i.e., using more than one related activity). Interventions were grouped together on the basis of their similarity. gay men in jockstraps studies provided evidence for more than one intervention. In these gay men in jockstraps the studies were reviewed for each applicable intervention. The gay men in jockstraps or nomenclature used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and gay men in jockstraps classifications sometimes differ from those used in the original studies. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to gay men in jockstraps these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) they were conducted in industrialized countries; and d) gay men in jockstraps compared outcomes in groups of persons exposed to the gay men in jockstraps with outcomes in groups of persons not exposed gay men in jockstraps less exposed gay men in jockstraps the intervention.

(17,20,21), and the Institute of Medicine (22). In addition to assessing gay men in jockstraps progress.