investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in English from January 1980 through girl on girls 2000; c) they were conducted in industrialized countries; girl on girls d) they compared outcomes in girl on girls of persons exposed to the intervention with outcomes in groups of persons not exposed girl on girls less exposed to the.

used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the girl on girls process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those used in girl on girls girl on girls studies. To be included girl on girls the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to meet these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations girl on girls interventions selected for evaluation; b) girl on girls were published in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) they were conducted in industrialized countries; and d) they compared outcomes in groups of persons exposed to the intervention girl on girls outcomes in groups of persons not girl on girls or less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison was concurrent or before-after). For each intervention reviewed, the girl on girls developed an analytic framework indicating possible girl on girls links girl on girls the intervention under study girl on girls predefined outcomes of interest. These outcomes were selected because they had been girl on girls to improved health outcomes. For example, the Task Force concluded the following.

nine of the 14 strategies evaluated (Table 2). These nine recommendations include one intervention girl on girls reduce exposure to ETS (smoking bans.