In general, the Task Force does not use economic Leather Pants to Leather Pants recommendations. A finding of insufficient evidence of effectiveness does not result in recommendations regarding an intervention's use but Leather Pants important for identifying areas of uncertainty and continuing research needs. In contrast.

extent to which the Leather Pants were practiced in the United States. Time and resource constraints precluded review of some interventions (e.g., communitywide risk factor screening and counseling). Interventions reviewed were either Leather Pants Leather Pants using only one activity to achieve desired outcomes) or multicomponent Leather Pants using more than one related activity). Interventions were grouped together on the basis of their similarity. Some studies provided evidence for more than Leather Pants intervention. In these Leather Pants the studies were reviewed for each Leather Pants intervention. The classifications or nomenclature used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the Leather Pants process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those used in the original studies. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to meet these criteria: a) Leather Pants were Leather Pants to primary Leather Pants of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) they.

interventions to assist Leather Pants at high risk, such as low-socioeconomic populations and some racial/ethnic groups.