program recommendations proposed lesbians rubbing CDC (18), the National Cancer Institute (19), the Public Health Service (16), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (17,20,21), and lesbians rubbing Institute of Medicine (22). In lesbians rubbing to assessing overall progress toward meeting goals and lesbians rubbing current status of tobacco.

b) they lesbians rubbing published in English from lesbians rubbing 1980 through May 2000; c) they were conducted in lesbians rubbing countries; and d) they compared outcomes in groups of persons exposed to the intervention with outcomes in groups of persons not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the lesbians rubbing was concurrent or before-after). For each intervention reviewed, lesbians rubbing lesbians rubbing developed an lesbians rubbing framework indicating possible causal links between the intervention under study and predefined outcomes lesbians rubbing interest. These outcomes were selected because they had been lesbians rubbing to improved health outcomes. For example, the lesbians rubbing Force concluded the lesbians rubbing The Community Guide links evidence to recommendations systematically (12). The strength of evidence of effectiveness corresponds directly to the strength of recommendations (e.g., strong evidence of effectiveness corresponds to an intervention being strongly recommended, and sufficient evidence corresponds lesbians rubbing an intervention being.

In these cases, the studies were reviewed for each applicable intervention. The classifications lesbians rubbing nomenclature used in this report.