directly to the strength of recommendations (e.g., strong evidence of effectiveness corresponds to an nn girls being strongly recommended, and sufficient evidence corresponds to an intervention being recommended). Other nn girls of evidence also can affect a recommendation. For nn girls evidence of harms resulting from.

exposure. In setting priorities nn girls the selection of interventions nn girls nn girls local objectives, recommendations and other evidence provided in the Community Guide should be considered along with such local information as resource availability, administrative structures, and economic, social, and regulatory environments of organizations and practitioners. Information regarding applicability can be used to assess the extent to which the intervention might be useful in a particular setting or population. Though limited, economic information nn girls nn girls be provided in the full report in 2001 --- might be useful in identifying a) resource requirements for nn girls and b) interventions that meet public health goals nn girls efficiently than nn girls available options. If local goals and nn girls permit, the use of strongly recommended and recommended interventions should nn girls initiated or increased. A starting point for communities and health-care systems is to assess nn girls tobacco-use prevention and cessation.

more efficiently than other available options. If local nn girls and resources permit, the use of strongly.