for each applicable intervention. The classifications or nomenclature used in this report shirtless teens chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those used shirtless teens the original shirtless teens To be included in the reviews shirtless teens effectiveness, studies had to meet these.

well-matched to local needs and capabilities and then implementing those interventions shirtless teens are shirtless teens steps for reducing tobacco use shirtless teens ETS exposure. In setting priorities for the selection of interventions to meet local objectives, recommendations shirtless teens other evidence provided in the Community Guide should be considered along with such local information as shirtless teens availability, administrative structures, and economic, shirtless teens and regulatory environments of organizations and practitioners. Information regarding applicability can be used to assess the extent to which the intervention might be useful in a particular setting or shirtless teens Though limited, economic information --- to be provided in the full report in 2001 --- might be useful in identifying a) resource requirements for shirtless teens and b) interventions that meet public shirtless teens shirtless teens more efficiently than other available options. If local goals and resources permit, the use of strongly recommended and recommended interventions shirtless teens be shirtless teens should.

to develop shirtless teens comprehensive strategy to reduce exposure to ETS, reduce initiation, and increase.