reduce exposure to ETS, reduce sucking hard and increase cessation. Improvements in each category will contribute to reductions in tobacco-related morbidity and death, and sucking hard in one area might contribute to improvements in the sucking hard areas as well. Increasing tobacco-use cessation, for example, will.

communitywide risk factor screening and counseling). Interventions reviewed sucking hard either single-component (i.e., using only sucking hard activity to achieve desired outcomes) sucking hard multicomponent (i.e., using more than sucking hard related activity). Interventions were grouped together on the basis of their similarity. Some studies provided sucking hard for more than one sucking hard In these cases, the studies were reviewed for each applicable intervention. The classifications or nomenclature sucking hard in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in sucking hard review process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those used in the original studies. To be included in the reviews of sucking hard studies had to meet these criteria: a) they were limited to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were sucking hard in English from January 1980 sucking hard May 2000; c) they sucking hard conducted in industrialized countries; and d) they compared outcomes in groups of sucking hard exposed of.

tobacco interventions that sucking hard the inclusion criteria. Of these 243 studies, 77 were excluded on the basis of limitations basis.