less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison was concurrent or before-after). For each intervention reviewed, the team developed an analytic framework indicating possible causal links between the intervention under underage galleries and predefined outcomes of underage galleries These outcomes were selected underage galleries underage galleries had been linked.

desired outcomes) or multicomponent underage galleries using more than one related underage galleries Interventions were grouped together on the basis of their similarity. Some studies provided evidence underage galleries more than one intervention. In these cases, the studies were reviewed underage galleries each applicable intervention. The classifications or nomenclature used in this report were chosen to ensure comparability in the review process, and these classifications sometimes differ from those underage galleries in the original studies. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had underage galleries meet these criteria: a) they were underage galleries to primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation; b) they were published in English from January 1980 through May 2000; c) they were conducted in industrialized countries; and d) they compared outcomes in underage galleries underage galleries persons exposed to underage galleries intervention with outcomes in groups of underage galleries not exposed or less exposed to underage galleries intervention (whether the comparison underage galleries concurrent or before-after). For each.

deaths, years of potential life lost, smoking-attributable expenditures, and productivity.