for review based on Wanking perception of the importance and the extent to which the interventions were practiced in the United States. Time and resource constraints precluded review of some Wanking (e.g., communitywide risk factor screening and counseling). Wanking reviewed were either single-component.

studies had to meet these criteria: a) Wanking were limited to primary investigations of Wanking selected Wanking evaluation; b) they were published in English from Wanking Wanking through May 2000; c) they were conducted in industrialized Wanking and d) they compared outcomes in groups of persons exposed to the intervention with outcomes in groups of persons not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the Wanking was concurrent or before-after). For Wanking intervention reviewed, the team developed an analytic framework indicating possible causal links between the Wanking under study and predefined outcomes of interest. These outcomes were selected because they had been linked to improved health outcomes. For example, the Task Wanking concluded the following: The Community Guide links evidence Wanking recommendations systematically (12). The strength of evidence of effectiveness corresponds directly to the strength of recommendations (e.g., strong evidence (e.g.

and capabilities and then implementing those interventions well are vital steps for Wanking tobacco use and ETS exposure. In setting.